What's New on Site | Shakespeare Skeptics Hall of Fame | Shakespeare Matters | FAQ
Bookshelf | Event Calendar

What's New?


Added 4/13/08

Why is the obscure Elizabethan history play, Richard II Part I, so important for the authorship question?

Added 5/7/07

Sir George Greenwood, in this classic 1921 essay, Ben Jonson and Shakespeare, explains why the trite orthodox objection, "You people are calling Ben Jonson a liar!" is no argument at all.

Added 4/11/07

The Shakespeare Fellowship has announced the resumption of its annual Shakespeare Authorship essay contest for high school students. Once again, cash prizes totalling $1350 will be awarded to the top six essays submitted by High School students from around the world. The deadline for the 2007-8 essay cycle will be January 15, 2008.

Added 7/12/06

Ramon Jiménez reviews the new edition of the anonymous Elizabethan history by Professor Michael Egan, Scholar in Residence at the Hawaii campus of Brigham Young University.

Added 7/10/06

In this extraordinary article (pdf format), "What's in a Nym?,"Alex McNeil explores the psychology of the pseudonym. The article originally appeared in the Winter 2003 (2:2) issue of Shakespeare Matters.

Added 12/1/05

Alex McNeil's trenchant interpretation of As You Like It, reprinted from the Spring 2003 (2:3) issue of Shakespeare Matters, is now available in the Virtual Classroom.

Added 11/29/05

At last we have a site index to help you keep track of where everything is!

Added 10/15/05

Roger Stritmatter's University of Tennessee Law Review (72:1, 171-219) essay on Venus and Adonis is now available in pdf format.

Added 8/21/05

The Reviews section now includes a review of Daniel Kornstein's book, Kill All the Lawyers (although originally written in 1997, the review's perspective still has a haunting relevance to the state of the Shakespearean discourse); the State of the Debate folder has a new challenge to David Kathman, with links to David Lindley's 2001 Shaksper exchange in which he questioned Kathman's confident assertions that Strachey's True Reportory is a necessary source for The Tempest. Strangely, more than four years later, Kathman has still not updated his website to acknowledge the exchange with Lindley, the editor of the New Cambridge edition of The Tempest (2002). And, as always, don't be afraid to check the NEWS.

Added 6/4/05

The "State of the Debate" folder in the Virtual Classroom has been reorganized and updated. Look for more updates soon.

Added 5/22/2005

David Kathman's internet essay, "Dating The Tempest" is the most recent in a long series of attempts by orthodox scholars to confirm a late date for the play based on that author's presumed awareness of a series of Jacobean pamphlets (f.p. 1609-1625) reporting on the 1609 wreck of Sir Thomas Gates in Bermuda. This new essay by Lynne Kositsky and Roger Stritmatter confirms the doubts articulated by Peter Moore in the two articles below and illustrates the precarious weakness of the orthodox position when tested against alternative theories. A companion article examines the question of whether or not Shakespeare had to have consulted the 1603 English translation of Montaigne's essays by John Florio.

Added 2/20/2005

Scholarly discourse can be infamous for its sluggish response to arguments which threaten to upset the equanimity of the ivory tower. These two articles by Peter Moore, The Dates of Shakespeare's Plays and The Tempest and the
Bermuda Shipwreck of 1609
,
have been around for some time but have never enjoyed the readership they deserve.

The former article was published in the orthodox Shakespeare Newsletter in 1990. You might think that by now orthodox Shakespeareans would have taken notice that the "argument from chronology" for excluding the Earl of Oxford's proposed authorship of the Shakespearean canon has the intellectual value of a 1940's bowling trophy. Concluded Moore in 1990: "The 'late start, late finish' theory on Shakespeare's dates is a rotten edifice founded on circular reasoning, spurious precision, shaky assumptions, selective use of evidence, and willful ignorance of context." If you don't believe us, read the article. We think Moore proves the case.

 

Added 2/18/2005

In recent days we've been updating the NEWS at a frenetic pace, but for a more substantiative update, to celebrate the successful addition of ABBY FineReader 6.0 Pro to our software suite, here is a reprint of Roger Stritmatter's 1997 review of the John Michell book, Who Wrote Shakespeare. Although the book is almost ten years old, it remains among the most popular and readable books on the authorship question. The questions raised in Stritmatter's review therefore remain relevant as we enter the 8th decade since the publication of Looney's landbreak study of de Vere's authorship of the Shakespearean canon.

Added 10/23/2004

We are pleased to add to our Review section Peter R. Moore's magnificent expose-review of Professor Nelson's Monstrous Adversary. First published in the Winter 2004 issue of the Shakespeare Oxford Society Newsletter , Moore's review exposes the shabby reasoning which undermines Nelson's use of historical fact to reach flamboyant but frequently preposterous conclusions. "There is a maddening disparity between Nelson the diligent research assistant and Nelson the puerile demonize," concludes Moore. "An objective scholar could have transformed Nelson's materials on Oxford's turbulent and messy life into an illuminating study of Elizabeth's Court. Instead readers of Monstrous Adversary end up asking who went further off the rails: Oxford or Nelson?

Added 10/22/2004

Few historians of modern intellectual culture are aware that the authorship question has been a topic of contemporary popular culture for more than fifty years. What did Horatio Smith, the Leslie Howard character in Howard's mythic 1940 anti-Nazi film, Pimpernel Smith, have to say about "Shakespeare"? Here's an excerpt.

Added 9/12/04

Lynne Kositsky and Roger Stritmatter's reply to Tom Reedy and David Kathman's Essay, "How We Know that Shakespeare Wrote Shakespeare: The Historical Facts," is now available. Kositsky and Stritmatter's Love's Labour's Lost runs through the Reedy/Kathman essay line by line, stipulating to some of the more obvious points and explaining just why Reedy and Kathman's ballyhooed "knowledge" is a species of false consciousness.

Added 6/2/2004

Tony Burton's second article on inheritance law in Hamlet, "Laertes's Rebellion as a Defense of His Inheritance: Further Aspects of Inheritance Law in Hamlet" is now available. Also the Law Library has been updated and revised.

Added 5/12/2004

We are pleased to make available Thomas Regnier's outstanding paper, reprinted from the January 2003  University of Miami Law Review, "Could Shakespeare Think Like a Lawyer? How Inheritance Law Issues In Hamlet May Shed Light on the Authorship Question."

Added 4/4/2004

The winning Senior Division entry  for the Shakespeare Fellowship 2003 Essay Contest,  Allison Taylor's "Edward de Vere: The True Bard, "  is now available.  More winning essays will be posted shortly.

Added 2/27/2004

New York theatre dialect consultant and historian of English K.C. Ligon has delivered a devastating critique (.pdf file) of the linguistic pronouncements of Alan Nelson's Monstrous Adversary, in the Winter 2004 issue of Shakespeare Matters. "Nelson has misidentified variant forms as errors, and foolishly proposed on the basis of occasional spellings that Oxford misheard those words even though he habitually wrote them in more normative contemporary forms. His evaluation of Oxford's dialect therefore proceeds from a suspect methodology. It is certainly not the assessment of a dispassionate professional, more like the cynical calculation of a hostile amateur."  For further   reviews of Monstrous Adversary, please visit our Review section.

Added 1/26/2004

The Shakespeare Fellowship's 3rd Annual Conference will be held in Baltimore, MD., October 7-10. Please visit our Conference page for details.

Added 1/25/2004

Now posted to the site is Anthony Burton's important 2001 article, "An Unrecognized Theme in Hamlet: Lost Inheritance and Claudius's Marriage to Gertrude."  The  article demonstrates that the bard's most famous play embodies a sustained  subtext  on the problem of English  inheritance law.  

We wonder why William Shakspere of Stratford would have been so preoccupied with this technical area of English legal proceeding that he would base his most autobiographical play on it.  As Thomas Regnier concludes in his January 2003  University of Miami Law Review article (coming soon!), "Could Shakespeare Think Like  a Lawyer?",  although Burton's article does not directly concern the authorship question, it does  lead in a definitively anti-Stratfordian direction.  "Burton's analysis moves us further from the Stratford theory and closer to those theories that suggest that someone with advanced legal training wrote Shakespeare's works," concludes Regnier (426).

Added 1/12/2004

We are pleased to make available Robert Detobel's extraordinary detailed examination of The "Shakespeare" Signatures.  Detobel's analysis reveals that the alleged signatures are almost certainly the work of scriveners, employing customary conventions of abbreviation, and that the cumulative evidence strongly suggests that William Shakspere of Stratford could not even write his own name. You be the judge. 

Meanwhile, we await a detailed response from David Kathman and Terry Ross.

Added 1/8/2004

We're pleased to present Hugh Trevor-Roper's 1962 Réalités essay, "What's In a Name?"

Added 12/5/2003

Richard Whalen's review of Alan Nelson's new biography of the Earl of Oxford, Monstrous Adversary (Liverpool 2003), reprinted from the Fall 2003 issue of the Fellowship's newsletter,  is now available in our Newsletter section (.pdf only).  A commentary by Roger Stritmatter (also .pdf)   is also now online.

Added 7/23/2003

This award-winning essay by Gary Livicari, "Shakespeare, The Man and the Myth," is available on the site.

Added 7/04/2003

Happy fourth of July to everyone. Here is what Walt Whitman had to say about the authorship question: "One of the wolfish earls or some born knowner and descendent would seem to be the true author of these amazing works...." So much for the "class snobbery" argument.

Added 6/24/2003

After some delay, Gary Livicari's award winning essay, with earned first prize in the Fellowship's 2002 essay contest in the Senior division, is now available here: Shakespeare-- The Man and the Myth. Other winning essays will be posted shortly.

Added 5/6/2003

 

Here's your chance to get a winking bard, before they've all sold out. Check out our shopping cart.

Added 3/16/2003

Here is a new review of Irv Matus' (1994) book, Shakespeare In Fact.

Added 3/9/2003

Our FAQ includes a new section, "Is That All?" which discusses the Sanders portrait.

Added 2/26/2003

A few weeks ago I promised Pogo on Shakespeare. Thanks for your patience. Walt Kelley was another one of those deep thinkers who had little use, apparently, for the Stratfordian just-so story.

Added 2/26/2003

This new Shakespeare-in-performance section has links to most of the major Shakespeare performance festivals in the United States, Canada and England. Going travelling? Here's your resource for discovering local Shakespeare in performance.

Added 2/26/2003

This extensive article on the Prince Hal plays by Shakespeare Fellowship member Ramon Jimenez is our newest offering in the Histories section of the Virtual Classroom. Jimenez argues convincingly that Edward de Vere is the author of the anonymous Elizabethan history play, The Famous Victories of Henry V. The play itself, which was attributed by Seymour Pitcher in 1961 to the "young Shakespeare," is now available online at Elizabethan Authors.com, thanks to Barb Flues and Robert Brazil. In his essay, Jimenez goes on to discuss the relationship between Famous Victories and the canonical Henry V play conventionally attributed to "Shakespeare" and dated 1599. He argues persuasively that the Shakespeare play was originally conceived much earlier, perhaps as early as a 1583.

Added 2/14/2003

Here's a link to the University of Massachusetts Renaissance Center, created by Professor Arthur Kinney and other Renaissance academicians and enthusiasts in the Northampton-Amherst area, including some noted Oxfordians. If you live New England area, or are just visiting, you may want to stop in to vist the Center's impressive collection of books and scholarly papers. The center also hosts regular Renaissance-related events.

 

Added 2/11/2003

Check out our new shopping cart.

Also, here's a new cognitive pathway into the Minerva Britanna problem.

Added 2/07/2003

To the de Vere Bible section, chapters 1-4, 29-30 of Roger Stritmatter's disssertation. These are .pdf files which require adobe acrobat. Please read, downl0ad, print, and discuss at your discretion.

Added 2/05/2003

To the Virtual Classroom: Hot off the presses from the Winter 2003 issue of Shakespeare Matters, Shakespeare Fellowship Trustee Alex McNeil on Ferdinand Pessoa and the psychology of authorship.

Added 1/22/2003

The month has been a very cold one, and the Shakespeare Fellowship's computer had to be rebuilt from the ground up with parts delivered by Santa's elves in a sled pulled by reindeer with mittens on their noses to ward off the frostbite, but updates on the site have now been resumed. Perhaps the most notable addition is a new link to an impressive essay by David Chandler featured at the Elizabethan Review, in our State of the Debate section. Further chapters from Roger Stritmatter's dissertation are also now available here.

Added 12/13/2002

Some folks may have noticed that as I write this on December 13, close to the witching hour, some changes have been taking place on the links page. I've been reorganizing and distributing things, trying to tidy up so that you can find what you're looking for. And new sources just keep popping up on a regular basis. And of course the internet is like a living organism and if you spend any time on it you'll find some amazing developments in many feilds of inquiry and art. Here is one that really impressed me recently (laugh, its a good site for laugher): BeanWorld. I found it because I was doing research online about Walt Kelly. I'll post some resources for Kelley as I find them, for those who incline in that delicious direction.

Added 12/7/2002

Renaissance Literature section added to the links section. Analysis of the Sander's portrait and the Trinity College symposium. Paul Altroochi's review of Shakespeare's Face from the fall 2002 issue of Shakespeare Matters.

Added 11/22/2002

Steven Roth's new Hamlet site added to the links section. This stunning article on Elizabethan and Jacobean authorship ruses from Baconiana (yes, its true, the Baconians got some things right) to the virtual classroom.

Added 11/20/2002

Three additional chapters of Roger Stritmatter's PhD dissertation are now available in pdf format in the Virtual Classroom section on the de Vere Bible.

Added 11/11/2002

Daniel Wright's incisive synopsis of the Funeral Elegy Scandal. The book which Terry Ross once heralded as "a model for attribution studies" is the subject of a critical new study By Gilles Montsarrat of the University of Burgundy which confirms Richard Kennedy's identification of the author as John Ford, not "William Shakespeare". Donald Foster, the author of the theory identifying the bard as the author, has retracted his own theory. So much for "definitive".

Added 7/13/2002

The book review niche now includes reviews of Irvin Matus' Shakespeare, IN FACT and Elizabeth Appleton's An Anatomy of the Marprelate Controversy. The former book, originally published in 1994, represents an important early failure by orthodox scholars to deal honestly with the authorship question. Reviewer Richard Whalen identifies Matus as an adept "dodger" of real issues but ultimately unpersuasive as a scholar. By contrast Appleton's 2001 book, reviewed by Roger Stritmatter, addresses head on one of the most important remaining enigmas of Elizabethan literary history, a question doggedly ignored by orthodox scholars: who was the literary masked man, "Pasquill Cavaliero of England?"

Added 7/8/2002

The Book Review Niche is now open for your reading pleasure. The complete listing of reviews will be posted shortly.

Added 6/24/2002

Three new entries to the News section illustrate the growing circles of Oxfordian influence in the wider culture. William Niederkorn's June 20 New York Times article on "A Funeral Elegy," a very bad 1612 poem attributed to Shakespeare by Georgetown Professor Donald Foster in 1989 and 1995, credits Shakespeare Fellowship member Richard Kennedy with discovering the poem's true author, John Ford. A forthcoming book by Brian Vickers, Director of Renaissance Studies at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, details Kennedy's theory.

The book led to Foster's very public recantation of his own theory, but not before Harold Bloom, the Riverside Shakespeare, and other prophets of the Shakespeare industry, had enthusiastically endorsed the wrong view. Clearly the revelation of Foster's recantation came as a shock to those who, like Foster himself at one time, had hoped that "Funeral Elegy" could supply a silver bullet to slay the Oxfordian monster. An irate 6-22 letter from Harvard Professor Stephen Greenblatt, who is working on a much-ballyhooed biography of the Stratford man, condemned The Times for asserting a connection between the Elegy controversy and "Gary Livicari"> the authorship question, and for presuming that the Oxfordians are not crackpots. "There is no evidence at all," wrote the Harvard Professor, that de Vere was the author of the Shakespeare canon. Gosh. "No evidence at all."

Added 6/23/2002

The Shakespeare Fellowship is pleased to present, from our spring Newsletter Mark Anderson's gracious but stinging rebuttal of Terry Ross's animadversions on Gabriel Harvey and the "Pierce Pennilesse" question. Anderson's article presents stunning new evidence that Harvey was "in the know" about the forthcoming pseudonymous publication of Venus Adonis in the spring of 1593: he boasts of being able to "unmask" a rich actor who is about to make a splash on the London scene. We invite all readers with an open mind to consider this new evidence, as well as weighing Anderson's critique of Mr. Ross's suasive and disengenuous methods of criticism.

Added 5/27/2002

Added to the Law archive of the virtual classroom: The complete text of Hamlet (from the second quarto of 1604) with legal annotations. A significant new resource for scholars and students, brought to you by Mark Alexander and the Shakespeare Fellowship.

Added 5/26/2002

Why all the fuss about Oxford? This online version of the Shakespeare Fellowship's 25 Connections (soon available from the Fellowship in a portable powerpoint version) gives a synopsis of the case for Oxford's authorship of the Shakespeare canon.

Added 5/7/2002

The Shakespeare Fellowship is proud to announce the establishment of an annual essay contest for 9-12th grade students in the United States and Canada. The contest guidelines are published on our Contest page.

Added 4/31/2002

To the virtual classroom: Richard Desper's astounding little gem on the "stars or suns" enigma from Henry V (III.7) illustrates the powerful interpretative character of the Oxfordian paradigm. This Oxfordian "mousetrap" in this canonical Shakespeare play amounts to a hidden signature of the real author, Edward de Vere, whose obscure family history is allusively refered to in the passage.

Added 4/19/2002

The Virtual Classroom now includes a section on Chronology, with two articles, one by Gwynneth Bowen (sister of the famed English novelist and historian Marjorie Bowen) on the date of The Tempest, and another by Paul Crowley, which exposes the orthodox dating scheme as a simple-minded "just so" story incapable of reasoned defense. We'd really love to hear what David Kathman and Terry Ross have to say in response to Crowley's brief but devastating critique of orthodox chronological assumptions. Will they respond? Based on their typical pattern of always ignoring the strongest arguments of their critics, we expect not. But perhaps we'll be pleasantly surprised.

Added 3/15/2002

The Beginners Guide to the Authorship question is now available in the Virtual Classroom. It contains links to Poetry of Edward de Vere, an abbreviated History of the authorship question (HTML version), Eva Turner Clarke on Spencer's nickname for Oxford, the Cuddy Question, and Andrew Hannas on Gabriel Havey's speech in which de Vere is saluted with the Latin epithet "thy will shakes speares" .

As you can see, we've been hard at work!

Added 3/ 13/2002

An abbreviated history of the authorship question is now available in the Virtual Classroom.

Added 3/ 12/2002

The Comedy section of the Virtual Classroom is now open for business. We're proud to present Robert Brazil's essay, "Unpacking Merry Wives of Windsor," reprinted from The Oxfordian, as our first offering on the exciting topic of reading Shakespearean comedies from the Oxfordian perspective.

Also, the State of the Debate section has been updated to include comparative links on the topic of Shakespeare and the Law. Read what David Kathman has to say on this subject on his web site, and then contrast that with the work of Mark Alexander on the same subject. We think you'll agree that Alexander's essay carries the day.

Added 3/ 10/2002

The Conference section. Online registration will be available shortly.

Added 3/ 1/2002

Our revised state of the debate section includes an update on the evidence of the Harvey-Nashe pamphlets. Does Thomas Nashe refer to Oxford as "Pierce Penniless" and "Master Apis Lapis"? You be the judge.

Added 3/ 1/2002

The new Classroom Resources section -- containing a growing selection of resources for secondary school educators -- is now available in the Virtual Classroom.

 

Added 2/25/2002

The 1st annual Conference of the Shakespeare Fellowship will be held the weekend of October 18-20, 2002 at the Sonesta Hotel on the scenic Charles River in Boston. Please visit our Conference page for details.

Added 2/21/2002

The virtual classroom now houses a new section on Shakespeare and the Bible, currently featuring a chapter from Roger Stritmatter's dissertation and several articles by him reprinted from Notes and Queries, the Oxford University Press publication in which Dr. Stritmatter, while still a graduate student, published several important building blocks of the argument eventually contained in his dissertation.

 

Added 2/12/2002.

The Virtual Classroom now includes several important new articles: Dr. Daniel Wright, a leading authority on the Shakespeare history plays and author of The Anglican Shakespeare, writes on the representation of the Earls of Oxford in the Shakespeare history plays, Merilee Karr , MD, a distinguished Portland playwright surveys the history an implications of our ideas about authorship, and Roger Stritmatter reviews Naseeb Shaheen's Biblical References in Shakespeare's Comedies.

Added 2/10/2002.

Check out this New York Times exclusive feature on the Shakespeare question.

Added 2/7/2002.

The redesigned Virtual Classroom now has room for our archive of articles on Shakespeare. The new Hamlet section includes Rebecca West's essay,"A Court and a World Infected by the Disease of Corruption, "J. Thomas Looney's "Self Revelation: Hamlet," and a chapter on Hamlet from Roger Stritmatter's dissertation.

Added 1/29/2002.

The new Bookshelf supplies direct links to ordering information for all the major Oxfordian works and other important Shakespearean items, such as Harold Goddard's classic The Meaning of Shakespeare. This section will be updated regularly as time and resources allow.

Added 1/24/2002.

The FAQ now includes a section on the omnipresent bugaboo of Shakespearean orthodoxy: Conspiracy.

Added 1/18/2002.

The new "State of the Debate" section in the virtual classroom has links to contending articles on the hot topic: "Was William Cecil Lord Burghley the historical prototype and inspiration for Polonius in Hamlet?" You read the essays and decide.

Meanwhile, The Shakespeare Fellowship continues to grow by leaps and bounds. In the past week alone we added 17 new members to our roster. Our goal of 350 members by the end of April 2002 now seems imminently achievable. Thanks to all the folks who have sent us notes of encouragement.

Added 1/9/2002.

To the News. Shakespeare Fellowship Founding Member Elizabeth Appleton (aka Elizabeth Van Dreunen) has been awarded the honorary degree of PhD in History for her book, An Anatomy Of The Marprelate Controversy 1588-1596 - Retracing Shakespeare's Identity And That Of Martin Marprelate, which attributes the three pamphlets published under the nom de plume "Pasquill Cavaliero of England" (1589-1590) to Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford. Watch for more details here soon.

The new Newsletter Page now includes excerpts from the second issue of Shakespeare Matters as well as the complete first issue. New postings include the second in Barbara Burris' impressive series of articles on the so-called Ashbourne "Shakespeare" portrait.

Added 1/6/2002.

To the News: Jonni Lea Dunn, a former student at the University of Texas at Arlington, has recently authored an impressive Master's Thesis on "The Literary Patronage of Edward de Vere, The Seventeenth Earl of Oxford". A review including excerpts from the thesis and ordering information, is available in the News Section.

Updated the FAQ to include new links to online resources such as the Encyclopedia Britannica entry on Edward de Vere, and additional commentary on the history of the authorship question.

Added 1/1/2002.

Several of our members have recently marked up impressive personal accomplishments. Read about them in our News section.